Monday, January 28, 2008

JOHN MCCAIN; THE "SYBIL" OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY

Tho' I've belted you an' flayed you,
By the livin' Gawd that made you,
You're a better man than I am, Gunga Din!

The New York Times has just endorsed John McCain as the republican nominee for president as opposed to Mitt Romney. This is tantamount to having the Yankees endorsing Gagne as the Red Sox closer over Papalbon. Ann coulter has written an editorial titled “'STRAIGHT TALK' EXPRESS TAKES SCENIC ROUTE TO TRUTH” which is a reference to the so-called straight talking campaign that McCain says he is running but is actually a bold faced lie. Her editorial goes a long way in explaining why the “Old Gray Lady” would want to see a McCain verses any democrat in the general election.

Ann Coulter compares McCain to Bob Dole who was said to be the most “electable” republican at the time;

“Unlike McCain, Dole didn't lie all the time while claiming to engage in Straight Talk. Of course, I might lie constantly too, if I were seeking the Republican presidential nomination after enthusiastically promoting amnesty for illegal aliens, Social Security credit for illegal aliens, criminal trials for terrorists, stem-cell research on human embryos, crackpot global warming legislation and free speech-crushing campaign-finance laws.
McCain has also opposed the Bush tax cuts and water-boarding for terrorists…..

McCain joined with the Democrats in demanding O.J. trials for terrorists at Guantanamo, including his demand that the terrorists have full access to the intelligence files being used to prosecute them. These days, McCain gives swashbuckling speeches about the terrorists who "will follow us home." But he still opposes dripping water down their noses. He was a POW, you know. Also a member of the Keating 5 scandal, which you probably don't know, and won't -- until he becomes the Republican nominee.”

The Ann Coulter editorial can be seen at http://www.anncoulter.com/ and I suggest anyone who is interested in making an informed judgment on who to vote for read this article.

No comments: